Legal Opinion

Boudrot v. Cochrane Chemical Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided August 1, 1901No. 1,092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At L,aw.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff was a common laborer, engaged in the employment of the defendant corporation, which was the producer, among other things, of sulphuric acid, for that purpose roasting pyrites in two classes of burners,' one known as “lump burners” and the other as “lines burners.” The lump burners were fed from time to time through doors opened for that purpose, and the plaintiff claimed that, when so fed, they emitted masses of smoke or gas, .or both. So far as this is concerned, the plaintiff had sufficient evidence to go to the jury on his proposition that they emitted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  4. Coughran v. BigelowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Frye v. LyonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  3. Morse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API