Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Davis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1923No. 23057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is here for the second time. At the first trial evidence was taken and both parties rested. A motion of defendant to direct a verdict in its favor was sustained, and the action dismissed. On appeal to this court the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. O’Hara v. Hines, 108 Neb. 74. Upon a second trial plaintiff recovered ,a judgment for $46,840.11, and from this judgment this appeal is taken.

*616The evidence upon the second trial is substantially the same as that produced at the first trial, the substance of which is set forth at length in the former…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. York v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. O'HARASupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Catania v. University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Morris v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Blitzkie v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Robinson v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API