Legal Opinion

In re Hunt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1921No. 22,682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Upon the relation of John E. Hunt the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the soldiers bonus board and soldiers board of review to review the decisions of those boards in reference to relator’s application for a bonus.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to the soldiers bonus board of review to determine the validity of the order denying the application of relator, John E. Hunt, for a soldier’s bonus.

The petition and return show that relator was a citizen and resident of this state when war with Germany was declared. On June 5, 1917, he registered, stating on the registration card that he contemplated marriage soon. He was married June 16, 1917. On January 8, 1918, he complied with the draft regulations in respect to his questionnaire. All answers therein appear to have been true. He gave the date of his marriage and designated his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cooke v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Soldiers Bonus BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Williamson v. Soldiers Bonus BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API