Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Falness

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1994No. 91-15626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

John and Anna Hugg were both named insureds in a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Both were killed in a collision with another vehicle which was uninsured. It is undisputed that both John Hugg, who was driving the Huggs’ vehicle at the time, and the other driver were negligent.

State Farm paid the estate of Anna Hugg the $100,000 policy limit for uninsured motorist coverage, but refused to pay anything under the liability coverage, contending that there was no coverage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DimmerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FalnessArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Betty FalnessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API