Legal Opinion
People v. Warner
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1988No. B014840PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Defendant Michael Warner appeals from a judgment (order granting probation) following conviction of unlawful sexual intercourse (Pen. Code, § 261.5) between June and July 1983 (count II), and two counts of lewd conduct (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)) between September 1980 and June 1981, with his adopted daughter. Defendant challenges the admission of some of his postarrest statements as elicited in violation of the California rule of People v. Pettingill (1978) 21 Cal.3d 231 [145 Cal.Rptr. 861, 578 P.2d 108], and its progeny, that once a suspect has invoked his Miranda…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. LittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. MaierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. GastileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.