Katelin Eunjoo Seo v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mathias, Judge.
[1] Smartphones are ubiquitous in modern life. See Riley v. California , --- U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2473 , 2484, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014) ("[M]odern cell phones, ... are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy."). The amount of personal information contained on a typical smartphone is astounding: photographs, contacts, emails, text messages, not to mention the personal information that is contained in widely used smartphone *420 social-media applications such as Facebook,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SpicerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- Katelin Eunjoo Seo v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2020