Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Vernon's Heirs

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of Washington, Penn, J. 1. The plaintiff is the legitimate son and heir of the deceased; born and reared in lawful wedlock. Is pater est quem nuptial demonstran!. C. C. 203. 2. The declarations of his parents cannot render him illegitimate. Tate v. Penn, 7 N. S. 548. Eloiv. Mader, 1 R. R. 584. 2 Toullier, 119 3 Partidas, tit. 14,1. 19. Pand. lib. 22, tit. 9,1. 29. Lacombe, “ Mat.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of Washington, Penn, J. 1. The plaintiff is the legitimate son and heir of the deceased; born and reared in lawful wedlock. Is pater est quem nuptial demonstran!. C. C. 203. 2. The declarations of his parents cannot render him illegitimate. Tate v. Penn, 7 N. S. 548. Eloiv. Mader, 1 R. R. 584. 2 Toullier, 119 3 Partidas, tit. 14,1. 19. Pand. lib. 22, tit. 9,1. 29. Lacombe, “ Mat. Enfant,” No. 10. 2 Manf., 442. Cowper, 591. To the introduction of such evidence, bills of exception were duly taken, and should prevail. 3. No evidence to estabbsh the illegitimacy.…

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Eustis, C. J.

This suit was instituted to set aside the last will of John Vernon, deceased; the plaintiff alleging himself to be the son and forced heir of the testator concurrently with the heirs of his deceased brother, Daniel Vernon. By the will the plaintiff was excluded from all share iu the succession, the testator declaring therein that John Vernon was his only legitimate child, and that the children of John were his sole legal heirs: these children were instituted his heirs, under the will, to the exclusion of all others.

The district judge was…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Succession of BarthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Jenkins v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Evans v. RobersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Lewis v. PowellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. S. D. Moody & Co. v. Sewerage & Water BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API