Legal Opinion

Radwan v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1996No. 94-AA-270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge:

Petitioner, Mohamed K. Radwan, appeals the decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (Commission) denying his motion to set aside a default judgment in favor of his tenant in the amount of $5,546.88 for overcharges in rent. The Commission denied Radwan’s motion because Radwan failed to proffer a defense to the complaint. Radwan argues that because no response is required to the tenant’s petition under the agency’s regulations, he had no opportunity to present a defense. He also contends that he was entitled to a hearing on the question whether the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Dunn v. ProfittDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Winchester Van Buren Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Clay v. DeeringDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mullin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Stancil v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API