Legal Opinion

People v. Stoffel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2010No. 108500PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Justices Freeman, Thomas, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Karmeier dissented, with opinion, joined by Chief Justice Kilbride and Justice Garman.

OPINION

The primary issue presented in this case is whether, in light of section 122 — 1(d) of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1(d) (West 2006)) and this court’s decision in People v. Shellstrom, 216 Ill. 2d 45 (2005), a trial court’s decision not to “recharacterize” a pleading filed by a pro se defendant as a postconviction petition may be reviewed for error. The appellate court held that it may and,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. VincentIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. The PEOPLE v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re N.G.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. People v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  3. People v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. People v. DonaldsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API