State v. Shumaker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The exceptive assignments argued in defendant’s brief involve these questions: (1) Did the court commit error by admitting in evidence, over defendant’s objection, the bank deposit slips retained by the depositor? (2) By admitting in evidence, over defendant’s objection, the microfilm copies of endorsements on checks and deposit slips delivered to the bank? (3) Did the court, in -its charge, give undue emphasis to the State’s evidence and contentions?
The defendant’s objections to the admissibility of the retained deposit slips is unsound. These slips were introduced as originals or duplicate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The People v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. KluckhohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bank of Varina v. SlaughterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.