Legal Opinion

Fay v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1989No. A8711-06906; CA A50271PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*398JOSEPH, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their personal injury claims against defendant county.1 They argue that the trial court erred in ruling that their claims are barred by quasi-judicial immunity. We affirm.

Plaintiffs, a mother and daughter, were assaulted by Hough six days after his release from the psychiatric unit of the Multnomah County Detention Center. The release was made under a program ordered by the federal district court to relieve jail overcrowding. A court-ordered matrix system was to be used to evaluate the potential risk to the community if a particular…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Praggastis v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fay v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Fay v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fay v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Fay v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API