In re the Marriage of Hadfield
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Husband appeals from a denial of his motion for elimination of spousal support due to a change of circumstances of the parties. We agree that spousal support should be eliminated and therefore reverse the trial court.
The parties were divorced in December, 1977, after a marriage of long duration. Their assets — which were substantial — were approximately equally divided with the exception of the trial court’s treatment of the husband’s vested retirement account from his employment by the federal government. This account was awarded to the husband in full. At the same time, in order to assure…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KitsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- In re the Marriage of HoreskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Marriage of ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- In re the Marriage of EchanisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- In re the Marriage of WolfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- In re the Marriage of KramerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979