Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Thermo Contracting Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 12, 1976No. Civ. A. 621-73PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
This action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d, is brought by Kashulines, a subcontractor, against his contractor, Thermo, and his contractor’s surety, International, for $84,000 allegedly remaining unpaid from work done on Thermo’s federal contract. The work involved refurbishing a fire protection station on Ascension Island. 1 Thermo counterclaimed for $96,000, $20,000 representing damages from the same work at Ascension Island, the balance comprised of other claims from other contracts between the two. Kashulines now moves to strike the counterclaim.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Avanti Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mathias v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Bichler v. DEI Systems, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Roper, Ibg, a Division of Roper Corporation v. A.I. Reisz and National Surety CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.