Legal Opinion
Waterman v. Morningside Manor
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 2013No. 26631PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this workers’ compensation appeal, we determine, for statute of limitations purposes, whether an amended petition related back to the original petition.
Background
[¶ 2.] Barbara Waterman, a nurse, began working at Morningside Manor in June 2008. In November of that year, she injured her lower back while assisting a resident. She received medical treatment for her injury and returned to work with restrictions in December. On May 13, 2009, she was released from work restrictions. A month later, Morningside’s insurance carrier sent Waterman a letter denying future…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughbanks v. DooleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Petrik v. JJ Concrete, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Nettles v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2020
- Wintersteen Revocable TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018