Legal Opinion

Hughbanks v. Dooley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2016No. 27345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Kevin Hughbanks appealed a summary judgment denying his petition for habeas corpus relief from his convictions for two counts of possession of child pornography and as a habitual offender. Hughbanks’s attorney filed his brief as a “Korth brief’ alleging a lack of arguably meritorious issues for appeal. See State v. Korth, 2002 S.D. 101, 650 N.W.2d 528. Upon consideration of the case, we identified two arguably meritorious issues for appeal and directed supplemental briefing on those issues. See id. ¶ 16 n. 6, 650 N.W.2d at 535 n. 6. After completion of supplemental…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Calderon v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KwaiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Asmussen v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Asmussen v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API