Ex Parte Brown
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*451 OPINION
2Per curiam
In this post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus, applicant asserts that Judge Baraka, the original trial court judge, violated his right to due process because he refused to consider the full range of punishment at the hearing on the State’s motion to adjudicate. We agree with applicant and therefore grant relief.
I
Applicant was charged with robbery. He pleaded guilty on July 12, 1989, and Judge Baraka deferred any finding of guilt and placed him on probation for four years. Shortly thereafter, applicant violated the conditions of his probation by failing to report to…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- De Leon v. AguilarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- McClenan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by171 opinions
- Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Grado, Michael AnthonyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Ex Parte EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Ex Parte Aftab Ali, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- Gaal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.