Legal Opinion

State v. Murdock

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County. Jim Murdock was convicted for unlawfully and feloniously owning, operating and having in his possession a moonshine still, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

Defendant was indicted, tried and found guilty by the verdict of a jury, for unlawfully and feloniously owning, operating and having in his possession a mechanism, apparatus and device, commonly known as a moonshine still, and by the judgment of the court thereon was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years and to pay a fine of three hundred dollars.

On the present writ of error, awarded him to such judgment, he complains, first, that the court below should have sustained his motion to quash the indictment, on the ground that the one count therein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GreerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. LutzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. HullWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State v. TomlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PreeceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. MelanakisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pyles v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Pyles v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API