State v. Lucero

DE MUNIZ, S. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of criminal trespass in the first degree, ORS 164.255, and one count of harassment, ORS 166.065(3). He argues on appeal that the trial court erred in excluding evidence supporting defendant’s belief that the legal proceedings resulting in his eviction from a foreclosed property were unlawful. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Williams, 313 Or 19, 828 P2d 1006 (1992). A bank obtained a foreclosure judgment and subsequently…