Legal Opinion
Herrera v. Union No. 39 School District
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 4, 2006No. 05-204PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. This appeal arises out of an employment dispute between plaintiff Dr. Ebaristo Herrera, former principal of Black River Union High School, and defendants Union No. 39 School District and Dr. James Van Hoof, the District’s superintendent. Plaintiff appeals from the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiff contends the court erred by concluding that the District’s decision to place him on paid administrative leave for the remainder of his term of employment without a hearing did not breach plaintiff’s employment contract or deprive him of a protected…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Linda Donato v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District Edward MetzendorfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Dr. Nolan L. Kinsey v. Salado Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Herrera v. Union No. 39 School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Herrera v. Union No. 39 School Dist.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006