Legal Opinion

United States v. Deft. 1

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 19, 2020No. Criminal No. 2001-0396Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, V. Criminal No. 01-cr-0396-1 (ESH) ABDUR R. MAHDI, Petitioner. New! Nee! “Nae! Nee Nee” “ne” Nee” “ee” Noe’ MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before the Court are motions filed by petitioner Abdur R. Mahdi pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to reopen his motion under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

due to several alleged errors by his § 2255 counsel on appeal. (See Mot. to Vacate, ECF No. 951; see also Mot. to Reopen, ECF No. 952.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over Mahdi’s motion,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API