United States v. Deft. 1
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, V. Criminal No. 01-cr-0396-1 (ESH) ABDUR R. MAHDI, Petitioner. New! Nee! “Nae! Nee Nee” “ne” Nee” “ee” Noe’ MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before the Court are motions filed by petitioner Abdur R. Mahdi pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to reopen his motion under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
due to several alleged errors by his § 2255 counsel on appeal. (See Mot. to Vacate, ECF No. 951; see also Mot. to Reopen, ECF No. 952.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over Mahdi’s motion,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hohn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Derrek ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.