Legal Opinion
Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U. v. Argentine Republic
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 5, 2020No. 1:15-cv-02739Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PETERSEN ENERGÍA INVERSORA S.A.U. and PETERSEN ENERGÍA, S.A.U., Plaintiffs, -against- ARGENTINE REPUBLIC and YPF S.A., Nos. 15 Civ. 2739 (LAP) Defendants. 16 Civ. 8569 (LAP) OPINION & ORDER ETON PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., ETON PARK MASTER FUND, LTD., and ETON PARK FUND, L.P., Plaintiffs, -against- ARGENTINE REPUBLIC and YPF S.A., Defendants. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court is a renewed motion to dismiss the above- captioned actions under the doctrine of forum non conveniens filed by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.