Legal Opinion

Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 2017No. 2016 CA 0230PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalloway, J.

| ¡/The protracted litigation in this case involves mineral rights and royalties associated with a production well, IP Pet. PPCQ No. 1 well, located on a certain tract of land owned by the plaintiffs in Terre-bonne Parish (hereinafter “St. Martin property”). In this appeal, the defendants IP Petroleum Company, Inc. (hereinafter “IP Petroleum”) and International Paper Company challenge a trial court judgment on remand that awarded the plaintiffs, Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. (hereinafter “Quality”), Michael X. St. Martin, and Virginia Rayne St: Martin: (A) $107,612.67 in unpaid…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Burguieres v. PollingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. STATE, DOTD v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Theriot v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Roper v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Naramore v. AikmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Family Worship Ctr. Church, Inc. v. SolomonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. ABS Services, Inc. v. James Construction Group, L.L.C., and the Continental Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Agrifund, LLC v. Radar Ridge Planting Co., Inc. and Thomas A. DickersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API