Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Johnson v. Judge of the Fifth District Court of the Parish of Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1869No. 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions
il IMPLICATION for a Mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtLudeling, C. J.
F. A. Cousin & Bro. obtained a judgment against Samuel Johnson for five thousand six hundred and eight and five one hundredths dollars, with legal interest from thirtieth September, 1867, in the Fifth District Court of the parish of Orleans.
Johnson applied for and obtained an order for a suspensive appeal, and he alleges, under oath, that within the legal delays, he furnished a bond for an amount exceeding one-half the sum he had been condemned to pay, with good and solvent security, as the law required.
Subsequently the plaintiff obtained an order from the District Judge commanding Johnson,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Judge of the First DistrictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
- Banks v. HydeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- State v. Atchafalaya Railroad & BankingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reynolds v. EganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Charvanel v. EsvardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. OckmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Succession of IllgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Borie v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.