Legal Opinion

Carter v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

There is ample evidence of negligence on tbe part of tbe driver of tbe truck which ran into tbe building occupied by plaintiffs. Etheridge v. Etheridge, 222 N. C., 616, 24 S. E. (2d), 477; Boone v. Matheny, 224 N. C., 250, 31 S. E. (2d), 364. Tbe plaintiffs seek to hold tbe defendant liable for tbe damages they sustained as a result thereof under tbe doctrine of respondeat superior. Tbe defendant denies all tbe essential allegations in tbe complaint, so that plaintiffs are put to proof of every fact necessary to support a recovery. Thus tbe question posed by this appeal is this: Is there any…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Martin v. Greensboro-Fayetteville Bus LineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Van Landingham Ex Rel. Van Landingham v. Singer Sewing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Knight v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Pridgen v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Owen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
  5. Branch v. DempseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API