Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Anglo-American Investment Trust, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 24, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The defendant does not claim that the ordinance under consideration is not a lawful exercise of the power delegated to municipalities by the zoning act, but contends that the use which its lessee proposes to make of the property is in no respect subversive of any of those purposes (the promotion of health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community) which all valid zoning regulations must be designed to secure. P. L., c. 42, s. 48. Indeed, defendant’s counsel go so far as to suggest that an injunction restrain ing the proposed use can “only be based upon the premise that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Brett v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Best v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Rye Beach Village District v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  4. Field v. AREA PLAN COM'N OF GRANT CTY., IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Antrim v. HohltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API