Sullivan v. Anglo-American Investment Trust, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
The defendant does not claim that the ordinance under consideration is not a lawful exercise of the power delegated to municipalities by the zoning act, but contends that the use which its lessee proposes to make of the property is in no respect subversive of any of those purposes (the promotion of health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community) which all valid zoning regulations must be designed to secure. P. L., c. 42, s. 48. Indeed, defendant’s counsel go so far as to suggest that an injunction restrain ing the proposed use can “only be based upon the premise that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Brett v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Best v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Rye Beach Village District v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Field v. AREA PLAN COM'N OF GRANT CTY., IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Antrim v. HohltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.