Legal Opinion

Burlington Savings Bank v. Grayson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

The respondent is a corporation organized under the laws of Vermont for the purpose of loaning money on real estate mortgages and had not at the time the loan in question was made and assigned complied with the laws of Idaho governing foreign corporations doing business in the state.

September 1, 1919, the Graysons gave their note and mortgage covering land in Idaho payable to Charles W. Wilson at Bellevue, Idaho, which mortgage was later assigned to the respondent. October 3, 1919, Graysons executed their two notes and mortgages covering the same land to Neil Campbell. The present action was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monaghan & Murphy Bank v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bonham National Bank of Fairbury v. Grimes Pass Placer Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Storer v. HeitfeldIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Portland Cattle Loan Co. v. Hansen Livestock & Feeding Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Davis v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Isaacson v. ObendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Goody Ex Rel. Goody v. Maryland Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Land Development Corp. v. CannadayIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. IretonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Siwooganock Guaranty Savings Bank v. CushmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API