Legal Opinion
Cisco Systems Inc. v. Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 1, 2026No. 5:25-cv-06441Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CISCO SYSTEMS INC., Case No. 25-cv-06441-NW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES, TERMINATING 9 v. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 10 DYNAMIC MESH NETWORKS, INC., et SHOULD BE SEALED, AND DENYING al., LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY 11 Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 70, 79, 81 12 13 On January 22, 2026, Defendants Dynamic Mesh Networks, Inc. d/b/a MeshDynamics 14 (“Dynamic Mesh”) and Francis daCosta (together, “Defendants”) filed a motion for attorney’s fees 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 285, 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Sunearth, Inc. v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.