Cates v. Duncan
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
1. The petition not only embraced a statutory application for partition (Cates v. Duncan, 180 Ga. 289, 179 S. E. 121), but it prayed also for an accounting from co-tenants for rents and profits, thus presenting a case in equity. Code of 1933, § 37-301; Andrews v. Murphy, 12 Ga. 431 (4); Huff v. McDonald, 22 Ga. 131 (68 Am. D. 487); Drew v. Drew, 151 Ga. 11 (105 S. E. 469); Keating v. Fuller, 151 Ga. 66 (105 S. E. 844).
2. In a suit in equity for a partition of land and other equitable relief, where some of the defendants filed an answer denying that the applicant was a cotenant,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Andrews v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- McCandless v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Sims v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Harris v. WoodardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Zeagler v. ZeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Werner v. WernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Hill v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Chambers v. SchallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.