Legal Opinion

Cates v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1936No. 11120PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. The petition not only embraced a statutory application for partition (Cates v. Duncan, 180 Ga. 289, 179 S. E. 121), but it prayed also for an accounting from co-tenants for rents and profits, thus presenting a case in equity. Code of 1933, § 37-301; Andrews v. Murphy, 12 Ga. 431 (4); Huff v. McDonald, 22 Ga. 131 (68 Am. D. 487); Drew v. Drew, 151 Ga. 11 (105 S. E. 469); Keating v. Fuller, 151 Ga. 66 (105 S. E. 844).

2. In a suit in equity for a partition of land and other equitable relief, where some of the defendants filed an answer denying that the applicant was a cotenant,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Andrews v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  2. McCandless v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Sims v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Harris v. WoodardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Zeagler v. ZeaglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Werner v. WernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Hill v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Chambers v. SchallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API