Hubbard v. Chapman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from trial term. Action by Horman Hubbard against Henry T. Chapman, Jr. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.
The plaintiff in this action constructed for one John W. Marshall a mill for crushing ores, called the “Marshall Pneumatic Stamping Mill,” and in the early winter of 1893 this mill was in the factory of the plaintiff. About the 28th day of February, 1893, the said Marshall entered into an agreement with the defendant, in which it was provided that “John W. Marshall agrees to deliver the Marshall pneumatic stamp mill, now at Horman Hubbard’s Works, 93 Pearl street, Brooklyn, aside car or steamer, f. o. b.,” and “Henry T. Chapman, Jr., agrees to forward said mill to the Gold Bullion Mines,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bogardus v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Oakley v. . MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- La Chicotte v. Richmond Railway & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Elting v. DaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Morowski v. RohrigNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Srybnik v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Srybnik v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Fox v. CowperthwaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901