In re the Controversy Between the Rexburg Investment Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.
This is an arbitration proceeding. In' this opinion the Rexburg Investment Company, one of the parties, will be designated as the Investment Company, and the Dahle & Eccles Construction Company, the other party, as the Construction Company. By written agreement in 1917 the Investment Company employed the Construction Company to complete the construction of certain dwelling-houses in Rexburg, Idaho, and agreed to pay therefor the actual cost plus a compensation of 10 per cent. Upon the completion of the work a controversy arose between them, the Investment Company claiming that it .had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roby v. RobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Parsons v. WrbleIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Spofford v. SpoffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Stoneburner v. StoneburnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Ryan v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phipps v. Boise Street Car Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
- West Rock Lodge No. 2120 v. Geometric Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. Corona Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Gord v. F. S. Harmon & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- West Rock Lodge No. 2120, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Geometric Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.