Legal Opinion

Gutierrez v. Benavides

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 5:12-CV-18PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

J. SCOTT HACKER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel,” (Dkt. No. 86), filed April 12, 2013. Plaintiffs have specifically addressed their motion to compel to “Defendant United States and the individual [United States] Defendants,” and have seemingly excluded the remaining Defendants. {Id. at 1). The parties have agreed that the disputed materials which form the basis for the present motion to compel “will be produced,” and thus the discoverability of the documents is not at issue. {Id. at 2; see also Dkt. No.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re Terra International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ambler v. NissenDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  2. Clarkson v. Alaska Airlines IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
  3. Cocke v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
  4. Hunter v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
  5. Krause v. KrauseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API