Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cash America Net of Nevada, LLC v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 2009No. 8 M.D. 2009Published

1Dissent

*1039DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Respectfully, I dissent. Simply, the initiative of the Department of Banking (Department) to abolish the business of payday loans in Pennsylvania has not been authorized by statute.

The Consumer Discount Company Act1 (CDCA) does not authorize the Department’s initiative. Section 3.A provides, in relevant part, as follows:

On and after the effective date of this act, no person shall engage or continue to engage in this Commonwealth, either as principal, employe, agent or broker, in the business of negotiating or making loans or advances of money or credit, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Gilligan v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth, Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API