Legal Opinion
Shore v. Groom Law Group
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 2005No. 00-CV-1675, 01-CV-82, 01-CV-1401PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge.
Appellant Linda Shore was a partner in a law firm, Groom Law Group, Chartered (“Groom” or “the firm”), until she was asked to resign after making comments to a client’s attorney that cast the firm in a negative light. After her departure, appellant sought arbitration of several grievances against the firm, alleging gender discrimination, retaliation for engaging in protected activity, breach of contract, and a variety of common law torts. Under her employment agreement with the firm, appellant was required to arbitrate her contract grievance, but in addition she…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Oehme, Van Sweden & Associates, Inc. v. Maypaul Trading & Services Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Camp v. KollenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Motor City Drive, L.L.C. v. Brennan Beer Gorman Monk Architects & Interiors, P.L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.