Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walden Behavioral Care v. K. I.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 2014Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Pierce, J.

While I agree with the majority’s analysis of the exception set forth at paragraph {a) of G.L.c. 233, §20B, I write to take issue with the determination that the paragraph (b) exception does not apply to G.L.c. 123, §7,8 civil commitment proceedings. At issue is whether a psychotherapist, examining a patient at the request of a mental health facility, potentially in connection with a petition for civil commitment, should be required to discuss with the patient the limits of confidentiality and to obtain a voluntary and knowing waiver of the privilege before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Youth Services v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. LambMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. In re Laura L.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API