Freeman-Sipes Co. v. Corticelli Silk Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Garvin County Court; W. B. M. Mitchell, Judge. Action by the Cortieelli Silk Company against the Freeman-Sipes Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SHARP, C.
The plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey, engaged in business in the city of St. Louis, state of Missouri, sued the defendant, a corporation organized under the laws of Congress formerly in force in the Indian Territory, with its principal place of business at Pauls Valley, Okla. The action was to recover the purchase price of a bill of goods, wares, and merchandise, sold defendant during the year 1908. Defendant’s answer admitted the allegations contained in the plaintiff’s petition, but charged that plaintiff, not having complied…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Reading Railroad Company v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Beard v. Union & American Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. HollowayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Kibby v. Cubie, Heimann & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Dr. Koch Vegetable Tea Co. v. ShumannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Central Life Assurance Society v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Fruit Dispatch Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.