Legal Opinion
J. Stacey Henderson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1955No. 12113PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
In a previous trial, appellant was found guilty by a jury under an indictment charging violation of the Mail Fraud Statute, § 1341, Title 18, U.S. Code. On appeal the judgment was reversed because of the admission of evidence which the Court considered incompetent and prejudicial. Henderson v. United States, 6 Cir., 202 F.2d 400, rehearing denied 6 Cir., 204 F.2d 126. On the retrial, in which the evidence held incompetent was not offered, appellant was again found guilty by a jury and received a sentence of five years imprisonment and a $1,000 fine, from which judgment…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Commonwealth v. MeyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Stephan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Rosalba SolivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Robert Earl BessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.