Legal Opinion
Michael L. McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc., Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 21, 2001No. 00-1324, 01-1113PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit in which Michael L. McGinley charges Franklin Sports, Inc. (“FSI”) with willful infringement of claims 1, 2, 6, and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,407,193 (“the '193 patent”). On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ruled in favor of McGinley on the issue of infringement, and the case proceeded to *1343trial on the issues of validity and willfulness. The jury found that the asserted claims were not invalid and were willfully infringed. On a subsequent motion filed by FSI for judgment as a matter of law…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corporation v. Elekta Ab, Elekta Instrument Ab, Elekta Instruments, Inc., and Elekta Oncology Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.