Legal Opinion
Met Laboratories, Inc. v. Reich
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 3, 1995No. Civ. Y-94-99Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
This action arises out of a settlement agreement reached by Met Laboratories Inc. (“MET”), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) of the Department of Labor (“DOL”). MET filed suit seeking to enforce the terms of that agreement, and the parties and intervenor Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (“UL”) filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
MET, UL, and Factory Mutual Research Corporation (“FM”) are in the business of testing electrical and other business and consumer equipment. Each of the companies is now…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Robert A. PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the TIMKEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Wilkinson v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.