Legal Opinion

Kietlinski v. Interstate Transport Lines, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

We agree with the trial court that the asserted policy defenses must fail, and that the insurance provided by Iowa and Peerless was in force with respect to the accident in suit.

1. Ownership of described vehicles. The vehicles, two Autocar tractors and two semitrailers, were described in the insurance policy issued by Iowa as being in the sole ownership of Interstate. Thus declaration 6 stated that “The named insured is the sole owner of the automobile except as herein stated,” no exception being specified, and insuring agreement VIII provided that “This policy applies only to accidents which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kruse v. WeigandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Rusch v. MielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Elmergreen v. WeimerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Mitchell v. Great Eastern Stages, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MERCHANTS IND. CORP., OF NY v. EgglestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Lewis v. BradleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Morn v. SchalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Textile Insurance v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Textile Insurance Company v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API