Legal Opinion
Kight v. Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 11, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2021-3189Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATHAN M. KIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-3189 (CKK/MAU) CRUNCHY TOBACCO, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 11, 2025) Plaintiffs Nathan Kight and Funnels, LLC moved for summary judgment in this Lanham Act suit against Defendant Crunchy Tobacco, Inc. Following a referral from this Court, Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya issued a [75] Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiffs’ [68] Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). Plaintiffs timely filed an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Talavera v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.