Legal Opinion
Poe v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1963No. Nos. 1063, 1064PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
These two cases were consolidated for trial, and result from a highway collision between two automobiles, one driven by Defendant-Bonck, and the other by Ronald F. Carr, not made a defendant. The respective Plaintiffs (Poe and Rodriguez) were guests in Carr’s automobile when it collided with Bonck’s automobile.
The Defendant-Insurance Companies are the respective liability insurers of Bonck and Carr.
In Case No. 1063, there was judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Poe and against Defendants, jointly and in solido, for $8,687.95, less $1,000.00 for medical expenses previously paid by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gunter v. LordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Wilson v. Yellow Cab Co. of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Cush v. GriffinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mooney v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Myers v. LandryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tamburello v. JaegerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Poe v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Schrimsher v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981