Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 1991No. 091-90PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery and his punishment was assessed by the jury at 50 years confinement. On appeal he contended that the trial court erred to admit evidence of an extraneous robbery over his objection. The Fort Worth Court of Appeals agreed and reversed the conviction, with one judge dissenting. Gilbert v. State, 781 S.W.2d 296 (Tex.App.—1988). We granted petition for discretionary review in order to examine the State’s contention that the court of appeals paid insufficient deference to the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy MaggittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. Rodda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mozon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Lazcano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  4. Peterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  5. GARY CARLTON CAMP v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API