State v. Melemai
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, J.
In this appeal the State seeks to reverse two orders of the circuit court. The first order suppressed incriminating statements made by the defendant because Miranda 1 warnings were not given defendant during his interrogation by the police. The other order dismissed the indictment against defendant because HRS § 291C-14 (1976), which requires motorists involved in accidents to furnish information, violates the defendant’s constitutional guarantee against compulsory self-incrimination. 2
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
On June…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kernan v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. KauhiHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WyattHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. GoodinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.