Stocker v. Hutter
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEALS BY PLAINTIPP AND DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY. Nos. 46, 55 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 1 December Term 1888, C. P. in Equity.
Read the full summary
APPEALS BY PLAINTIPP AND DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY. Nos. 46, 55 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 1 December Term 1888, C. P. in Equity. On October 29,1888, William U. Stocker filed a bill in equity against William H. Hutter, in which he averred: 1. On or about the first day of September, 1879, with the defendant I engaged in the business of buying wood lots and cutting and marketing the timber and wood thereon, and continued so doing, at intervals, until on or about the first day of January, 1885. 2. The first wood lot, known as the John J.…
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKER’S APPEAL.
Opinion,
Mr. Justice Clark :
The bill in equity in this case was filed by William U. Stocker against William H. Hutter, for an account of moneys *23received and expended by Iiutter, in certain timber transactions between them, in Northampton county. The controversy embraces operations upon three different tracts of woodland, known as the Unangst, the Bangor or Long, and the Point Phillips tracts; and each of these tracts, having been operated upon a different contract from the others, is the subject of a separate and independent adjustment. The defendant’s answer denied any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gyger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Borough of Port Royal v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Bryan v. TroutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steinmeyer v. SiebertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Hodge v. Me-Bee Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Mead v. SherwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Nicolazzo EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Brotherton Bros. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.