Legal Opinion

Hodge v. Me-Bee Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1968No. Appeals, Nos. 1 and 19PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

The cross appeals which this Court is today called upon to decide arise from the following transaction. Samuel Hodge and four medical doctors are the sole stockholders of the Me-Dee Company, which in turn owns all the stock of Me-Bee Company. Both corporations were formed for the purpose of erecting, operating and occupying a medical building in which the four doctors would conduct their respective medical practices. Hodge’s exact stake in this venture has never been made completely clear, although it appears that certain tax advantages befell him as a result of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Sowers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Harwood v. Bruhn Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Fenerty Disbarment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Rice v. ShumanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. FeldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Matthews EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. BurkettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API