Legal Opinion

Hans Peymann v. Perini Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 24, 1974No. 74-1143Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a petition for rehearing addressed to the propriety of our ruling that the jury verdict for the defendant on the unseaworthiness count rendered moot, or disposed of, plaintiff’s claim that he should have been permitted to go to the jury on the negligence count. *1324While we find the petition without merit, the brief in support is based upon a misconception it might be well to answer.

The district court in its charge defined as unseaworthiness all of the deficiencies asserted as resulting from defendant’s alleged negligence.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Raymond E. McMillen Jr. v. United States of America, Douglas Gruchy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  4. Martin Farnarjian v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Lunsford v. Halcyon Steamship Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API