State v. Raglin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellant presents twenty-one propositions of law for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have considered each of appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. Upon review, and for the reasons that follow, we uphold appellant’s convictions and sentences, including the sentence of death.
I
We have held, time and again, that this court is not required to address and discuss, in opinion form, each and every proposition of law raised by the parties in a death penalty appeal. We continue to adhere to that position today. We…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.