Legal Opinion
Proctor v. Painter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1926No. 4703PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
March 27, 1917, the plaintiff in this suit filed his coal declaratory statement for the northeast quarter of section 34, township 22 north, range 7 east W. M. May 14, 1919, the Department of *975the Interior denied his application to purchase. March 24, 1920, the appellee Painter received a patent from the United States for the south half of the quarter section in question, and other lands, under the Act of June 22, 1910 (36 Stat. 583 [Comp. St. §§ 4666-4668]), which provides that unreserved public lands of the United States, exclusive of Alaska, which have been withdrawn or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Burfenning v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Morton v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wilson v. Elk Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Nichols v. RysavyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- State v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- City of Kenai v. Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.