Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Amirault
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 4, 1993PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The Commonwealth appeals from a judge’s allowance of the defendants’ motions to revise or revoke their sentences. On July 15, 1987, the judge sentenced each defendant to concurrent terms on multiple convictions of inde*113cent assault and battery on a child and rape of a child.2 On August 12, 1987, the defendants each filed a motion to revise or revoke the sentence pursuant to Mass. R. Grim. P. 29, 378 Mass. 899 (1979).
On June 24, 1992, the defendants requested that their rule 29 motions be heard. On October 1, 1992, the trial judge held a hearing and allowed the defendants’ motions. The judge…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. LayneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. SitkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. TherrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. YelleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AmiraultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. LeFaveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District Commonwealth v. RoberioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Holmes v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.