K. J. P. v. State

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge

K.J.P. appeals the trial court’s order directing him to register as a sex offender. He presents two restated issues:

1. Was the juvenile court’s determination that K. J.P. is required to register as a sex offender premature and in conflict with the rehabilitative goals of the juvenile code, where K.J.P. had not completed a court-ordered counseling program at the time of the hearing and determination?

2. Is the order requiring K.J.P. to register as a sex offender supported by clear and convincing evidence that he is likely to repeat a sex offense?

We affirm.

In September…